<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Finances and Loans Solutions &#187; mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/tag/mortgage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com</link>
	<description>Make your financial advice personalized</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Picking stocks by the numbers</title>
		<link>/picking-stocks-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>/picking-stocks-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most managers pick stocks by the numbers: P/E ratios, earning growth rate, EBITDA to enterprise value, and so on. Hundreds of studies have shown that you cannot outperform the market looking solely at numbers. Insight is required. But insight can cost a manager his job and a $500,000 annual salary. Picking stocks by the numbers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Most managers pick stocks by the numbers: P/E ratios, earning growth rate, EBITDA to enterprise value, and so on. Hundreds of studies have shown that you cannot outperform the market looking solely at numbers. Insight is required. But insight can cost a manager his job and a $500,000 annual salary. Picking stocks by the numbers as does everyone else, keeps those paychecks rolling in. In interviews and slick marketing brochures, mutual fund managers boast that they have one-on-one contact with company managers. Unfortunately for you, every mutual fund manager talks to the same company managers at your expense. Trips to New York, Boston, Silicon Valley, and Los Angeles are paid for by you. Investment conferences in Las Vegas, Honolulu, and Hong Kong cost you even more money. Because all the fund families talk to all the companies and go to all the conferences, no one gains any insight and all return home to the same numbers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Fund gathering, job security, and indexing has resulted in most funds, index and non-index, owning the same stocks. Overowned stocks have huge market capitalization. It requires larger and larger purchases of stock to move prices up. In essence, $100 million in new money will increase the value of a $1 billion stock by 10 percent; a $100 billion stock will only increase in value by 0.1 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/picking-stocks-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. TAX POLICY FAVORS HIGH-RISK INVESTING</title>
		<link>/us-tax-policy-favors-high-risk-investing/</link>
		<comments>/us-tax-policy-favors-high-risk-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear that during many of the past 50 years, risk-free investments such as Treasury bonds offered real after-tax returns that were either negative or in the low single digits for high-bracket investors. (For example, a 5 percent nominal return in a 40 percent tax bracket with 3 percent inflation is a zero percent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">It is clear that during many of the past 50 years, risk-free investments such as Treasury bonds offered real after-tax returns that were either negative or in the low single digits for high-bracket investors. (For example, a 5 percent nominal return in a 40 percent tax bracket with 3 percent inflation is a zero percent real return.) Under these conditions, a safety-minded investor cannot create much value, and during long periods she may slowly see value erode.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But a high-risk investor can actually do a fairly good job of approximating total tax avoidance. If she invests in a basket of fairly high risk, poorly correlated securities, in an average year she will have some gains and some losses, but more probably a net gain. (Common stocks have averaged about 11 percent annual appreciation over the past 70 years.) She can sell all of her losers to establish tax losses and sell winners that generate an equal amount of gains. The tax-free proceeds of these sales can pay her living expenses, and any balance can be reinvested in new stocks. Until she runs out of losses, she will pay no tax. In effect, she can use risk—here viewed as a dispersion of returns—to create a tax shield, whereas we have shown why an investor who opts for a risk-free return has no such shield.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">With a tax structure that favors value-creating high-risk investing and rather heavily penalizes more conservative investment patterns, it is no surprise that the United States leads the world in business innovation. The good news is that we seem, for the moment, to be better than the other guy. However, viewed through the lens of total value, the U.S. tax system is a large encumbrance when compared to an ideal system designed to maximize value creation. This is the bad news. But it is also good news, in a sense: There is room for improvement. As we get smarter, we’ll get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/us-tax-policy-favors-high-risk-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PERSONAL FINANCES AND SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION</title>
		<link>/personal-finances-and-small-business-administration/</link>
		<comments>/personal-finances-and-small-business-administration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 30, 1953, the federal government established the U.S. Small Business Administration with the purpose of aiding, counseling, assisting and protecting small businesses. SBA financial assistance is vital to the growth and startup of small businesses. Over the years, the SBA has grown in its total assistance provided and also the types of programs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On July 30, 1953, the federal government established the U.S. Small Business Administration with the purpose of aiding, counseling, assisting and protecting small businesses. SBA financial assistance is vital to the growth and startup of small businesses. Over the years, the SBA has grown in its total assistance provided and also the types of programs offered. Almost 20 million small businesses have received assistance through one or more of the SBA’s programs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In addition to financial assistance, the SBA also offers tools to manage a business from start to finish and has made improvements to its own business processes. Following the hurricanes of 2005 (Katrina, Rita and Wilma), the SBA experienced an overwhelming number of loan applications from disaster victims. Lacking the capacity to process all of the loans, the SBA established the framework for a recovery plan to deal with future disasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/personal-finances-and-small-business-administration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FINANCES &#8211; NO CDO BENCHMARKS</title>
		<link>/finances-no-cdo-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>/finances-no-cdo-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analyzing CDO performance is challenging because there is no publicly available secondary market data. Furthermore, there are no readily available performance statistics or CDO indexes to gauge total returns. Certain proxies for CDO collateral performance exist, such as leveraged-loan closed funds (as a proxy for CLOs), synthetic residential MBS indexes, and leveraged-loan indexes, but due [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Analyzing CDO performance is challenging because there is no publicly available secondary market data. Furthermore, there are no readily available performance statistics or CDO indexes to gauge total returns. Certain proxies for CDO collateral performance exist, such as leveraged-loan closed funds (as a proxy for CLOs), synthetic residential MBS indexes, and leveraged-loan indexes, but due to structural and managerial differences, these are not always a good substitute for the various notes in the CDO structure.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Still, there is ample information available to investors to monitor their individual transactions. Most dealers publish surveillance reports. Moody’s publishes a series of monthly reports (see the appendix to this chapter) that detail CDO performance, broken down by vintage and collateral type. These reports are the closest publication we have to a market performance matrix. Moody’s even details CDO equity returns. The reports are extremely beneficial when examining macrotrends in the CDO market but, because names are not listed, the reports cannot be used to determine the performance of specific deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/finances-no-cdo-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Principled agreement on financial package</title>
		<link>/principled-agreement-on-financial-package/</link>
		<comments>/principled-agreement-on-financial-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personal-finances-advisor.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats and Republicans have settled in the U.S. Congress on a 700 billion euro package for heavy rescue ailing financial institutions agreed. The Democratic chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Chris Dodd, said on Thursday after two talks: &#8220;We are very confident that we can act expeditiously.&#8221; Republican Senator Bob Bennett said: &#8220;I expect now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Democrats and Republicans have settled in the U.S. Congress on a 700 billion euro package for heavy rescue ailing financial institutions agreed.</p>
<p>The Democratic chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Chris Dodd, said on Thursday after two talks: &#8220;We are very confident that we can act expeditiously.&#8221;</p>
<p>Republican Senator Bob Bennett said: &#8220;I expect now that we in fact have a plan, which the House of Representatives and the Senate passed and signed by the president.&#8221; Details of the agreement were not initially known.</p>
<p>&#8220;Economy in danger&#8221;</p>
<p>On Wednesday evening, Bush was in a dramatic televised address on prime time demanded quick decisions. &#8220;Our whole economy is in danger,&#8221; warned the president. &#8220;Without immediate action of Congress could America in a financial panic slip, and an unfortunate scenario could unfold.&#8221; Alongside the Democrats Obama and McCain, the Republican Bush also asked leading members of Congress, attended the meeting at the White House to participate. He even called Obama personally to invite him, as his spokeswoman announced.</p>
<p>Even before the agreement has the hope to rescue the U.S. stock markets on Thursday brings profits. The Dow Jones index of defaults rose to the afternoon by 2.2 percent to 11,065 points. In Frankfurt, the Dax with a gain of two percent to 6,173 meters from the trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/principled-agreement-on-financial-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
